A critical linguistic analysis of two articles online for social Research Proposal

A critical linguistic analysis of two articles online for social distance and agency and affectedness - Research Proposal Example The dialogue in the articles often fails to resemble the typical features of naturally occurring conversation because they often involved predetermined conversations. Language users unconsciously use field and tenor in their conversations, and it is only in some instances that a newspaper article achieves such levels of naturalness. The main conceptual themes for the investigation involves the use of ‘field’ and ‘tenor’ and relevant concepts of linguistic theory that associate to the terms. The paper will explore tenor and interpersonal positioning in spoken communications as highlighted in unit 12 (Getting Interpersonal: The Grammar of Social Roles and Relationships). Through the articles provided, the proposal will analyze tenor in non-interactive texts, specifically personalization, standing, and stance. The rationale of the investigation is that it educates the society on communication and presentation of information. Unit 13, Construing human experience: grammar, representation, and point of view, introduces the concept of agency and affectedness, which will be useful in the proposal. It offers insights on representational and evaluative effects in terms of agency and affectedness. The relevant analytical tools, ideas, and issues in the E303 material that insists in the investigation include field, tenor, and mode. This proposal explores the two articles in relation to communicative and linguistic processes. Ideas, issues, and related research in the module that support my rationale and may be useful in data analysis include personalization, situational and functional characteristics. The situation in the articles is a terrorist attack in Tunisia. The typical speech features present in both articles are field and tenor. Social and functional define the two main types of variation in language. Terrorism is a social aspect that affects the public, especially because of the loss of lives. Field of discourse defines the situational context in

Why Sartre Was Wrong Personal Statement Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Why Sartre Was Wrong - Personal Statement Example One of the most famous quotations from Being and Nothingness is â€Å"Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does.† The idea that freedom is a negative thing, is something that a person is condemned to, is very strange. It is a bit like saying the light is darkness or absence is a presence. What Sartre means is that freedom is a terrible responsibility if all you have is your one life and nothing more. But this doesn’t make too much sense, if a person believes, like Sartre, that the world is meaningless. The nausea of seeing yourself and your perceptions reflected back in the world or the world filling with yourself is also something to be disagreed with. In a way, the kind of existentialism Sartre complains about is really solipsism: the belief that you are the only thing in the world, or the only thing that exists. If Sartre stopped for a moment to look at the world, he wouldn’t see his own ugly face reflected back in the petal of a flower or in a sunrise: he would see a dazzling display of the natural world and the fact that people are part of it all, that this is designed to be our world where we should be happy.Sartre was clearly a very smart man, but he was too much a product of his time and unable to get outside of his gloomy state of mind to see the world as it really is. There is so much wonder and strangeness in the world that it is actually quite difficult to do what he did: reduce it all to ash.... His old world was destroyed and he literally had to try to come up with new values for a new world. It is just a bit disappointing that these new values are not based in the past and are cut free from any tradition or original truth like the existence of God. One of the most famous quotations from Being and Nothingness is "Man is condemned to be free; because once thrown into the world, he is responsible for everything he does."3 The idea that freedom is a negative thing, is something that a person is condemned to, is very strange. It is a bit like saying light is darkness or absence is presence. What Sartre means is that freedom is a terrible responsibility if all you have is your one life and nothing more. But this doesn't make too much sense, if a person believes, like Sartre, that the world is meaningless. The nausea of seeing yourself and your perceptions reflected back in the world or the world filling with yourself is also something to be disagreed with. In a way the kind of existentialism Sartre complains about is really solipsism: the belief that you are the only thing in the world, or the only thing that exists. If Sartre stopped for a moment to look at the world, he wouldn't see his own ugly face reflected back in the petal of a flower or in a sunrise: he would see a dazzling display of the natural world and the fact that people are part of it all, that this is designed to be our world where we should be happy. Sartre was clearly a very smart man, but he was too much a product of his time and unable to get outside of his gloomy state of mind to see the world as it really is. There is so much wonder and strangeness in the world that it is actually quite difficult to do what he did: reduce it all to ash.